| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Helling
Registered User
Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 129
Karma: +15/-40
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 4:04 am Post subject: |
 |
|
I did try most fingerings, but for me the one you suggest isn't really better.
On the other hand, I don't really have any actual mistakes in this part, so I guess I didn't think about it so much. I still don't know quite what you are referring to specifically (which is not to say I am not rather annoyed about OTHER parts of my recording, but this one in particular I guess I just don't get - it's really not a very difficult part). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Goldberg
Incorrigible Failure
Age: 17
Gender: 
Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 498
Karma: +32/-18
Location: Cygnus X-1
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Here--I'll listen to it again in a couple minutes with the score in front of me and take a more careful listen. Maybe it wasn't as uneven as I thought at first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Helling
Registered User
Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 129
Karma: +15/-40
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| As far as the first paganini etude, it's actually rather similar sounding in both versions, but easier by a bit in the first setting. This would be a good candidate for combining two versions - the second version works well enough without unnecessary difficulties, but the coda is nicer in the first version I believe, with the nice arpeggios swooping around the melody (not sure if you know what part I mean). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Forum Rules
Links
Library
Members
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
New User
