Max wrote:10/7 is stupidly awkward out of all the Etudes. I bet that he could play it but not to the same standard as the rest of the etudes (didn't he say that he 'couldn't play' 25/10 as well?)
He could play 25/10, it's in the art of the piano...
Max wrote:10/7 is stupidly awkward out of all the Etudes. I bet that he could play it but not to the same standard as the rest of the etudes (didn't he say that he 'couldn't play' 25/10 as well?)
Amnesia wrote:Jeliness2 wrote:Once you get to playing Chopin, it's not a matter of leveling, or whatever. You can't just "grade" it by difficulty as if it were some method book, because now, challenges arrise because of weaknesses of the pianist himself.
Hamelin> Nocturnes?
Horowitz> Etude no.7?
etc...
That's absoutely true. The difficulty of a piece depends almost entirely on the pianist's technical capabilities. What may be easy for one person might be hell on earth for another. Of course one can rate a piece generally speaking, but there can be no definitive rating system for every pianist since everyone's capabilities on the piano vary a great deal..
Max wrote:10/7 is stupidly awkward out of all the Etudes. I bet that he could play it but not to the same standard as the rest of the etudes (didn't he say that he 'couldn't play' 25/10 as well?)
pianoknight wrote:Interesting how you find both 10/1 and 10/7 manageable because if I recall, these are the two etudes that Horowitz struggled with. In fact he said something about how if Chopin would have played on a modern piano, he might of altered 10/1. Case and point, difficulty of the etudes varies depending on the assets of each individual player.
As far as the preludes go, I can't possibly agree with No. 2 being one of the easier ones (in my subjective opinion). Musically, it's considerably difficult to make this piece not sound like a mindless drone, going on and on for what seems like ages. But of course this is just my opinion.
![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest